Newsletter
One claim from the current conversation, checked against 14,951 items of what the trade press actually published. Monthly, and not a summary of the week's news.
Last reviewed September 4, 2026
What arrives
Something is being repeated in the industry this month. It gets taken apart against the record: how often the trade press has actually written about it, when that started, whether the pattern being described is visible across the coverage on file or is being asserted from memory.
Every figure is computed the same way the pages here are, from the same corpus, with the same statement of what it cannot support. The method page describes the checks, and issues that reach a conclusion the record cannot carry say so instead of reaching a different one.
What does not arrive: a roundup of the week, a list of vendor announcements, or anything a summary of the news already gave you free. That work is done well elsewhere and there is no reason to do it worse.
What happens to your address
It is stored to send you the newsletter and for nothing else. Not enriched, not matched against anything, not passed to a third party, and never sold or rented.
Nothing tracks whether you opened it. There is no tracking pixel and no wrapped link reporting a click back to us. This costs real information — we cannot tell which issues land — and it is the correct trade for a publication that spends its pages objecting to exactly that practice elsewhere.
One click removes you, from a link in every issue, with no confirmation step and no question about why. The address is deleted rather than suppressed.
The privacy policy covers the rest.
Subscribe
The list is not open yet. When it is, the form appears here.
To be told when the first issue goes out, write to [email protected] with the word newsletter in the subject. Your address will be used for that and nothing else, and you will be asked to confirm before anything is sent.
How the form is protected
Published because none of it depends on being secret. A defence that only works while nobody knows about it is not a defence, and a reader handing over an address is entitled to know what happens around it.
There is no third-party captcha here, which is a deliberate choice with a cost. A captcha would mean loading a script from another company's domain — the exact practice this site refuses everywhere else — and the visual kind is defeated by human solving services for less than a dollar per thousand while reliably obstructing readers using a screen reader.
- 1. Confirmation before anything
Your address does nothing until you click a link sent to it. Nobody can add somebody else, and an automated signup achieves nothing, because the confirmation lands with whoever owns the address rather than with whoever typed it.
- 2. A signed ticket
The page requests a short-lived token when it loads, and the server refuses any submission without a valid one. This stops the common case: a bot that finds the endpoint and posts to it directly, never having loaded the form.
- 3. A clock
The token carries the moment the server issued it. A submission arriving under three seconds later was not typed by a person, and one arriving twelve hours later has expired.
- 4. A field you cannot see
There is a decoy input hidden from browsers and screen readers alike. Anything that fills it is automated, and that submission is discarded without scoring.
- 5. No links, at all
A signup needs no URL, so any URL is treated as a strong signal. Shorteners, link markup and the vocabulary of link-buying score heavily, and text hiding behind zero-width characters or lookalike Cyrillic letters is normalised before any of it is checked.
- 6. Header injection is refused outright
A line break or an extra recipient in any field is not spam but an attempt to turn the form into a relay. Those submissions are rejected without scoring and without a distinguishable response.
The checks run on the server, not in your browser. Anything running only in the page is decoration, since an automated client never executes it. The same filter is applied to every form on this site, and it is itself covered by an automated test that feeds it real junk mail and real messages and fails if it gets either wrong.
Past issues
None yet. When there are, they are published here in full, before you are asked to subscribe to anything — an archive you can read first is the only honest way to sell a newsletter.
In the meantime, the same method at greater length: the year-by-year analysis of what the trade press has published since 2014.